You Can’t Have Too Many

Thursday, September 30 2004 -- Filed under: — Carmon @ 11:05 pm

readposter1 (15k image)

Suzanne was considering whether she should attend an upcoming library sale considering that she was running out of room for books. Her wise mother gave her permission, however, and had all sorts of clever suggestions for where she could store her hoard booty haul.

Some women agonize over color schemes or styles of window coverings. Tomorrow we have some wood flooring being delivered for my new parlor and some carpet next week. It took me about five minutes to decide which styles I wanted. It’s the bookshelves for the new library which get me really excited. A young man is coming next week to discuss building them for us.

If you would like some help with redecorating your domicile, I’ve finally updated my bargains list from Bookcloseouts. There are lots of great children’s classics and picture books, and many books which are recommended in the Sonlight curriculum. If you’d like to be added to my email list which notifies you when I’ve updated the bargains page, email me at carmon(at)softanswer(dot)com.

“Books do furnish a room.” ~Anthony Powell



Pluralism?

Wednesday, September 29 2004 -- Filed under: — Carmon @ 10:31 pm

Did you know?

The War for Independence was called the Presbyterian Rebellion?

The Constitution calls for one day of rest for the president: Sunday? (see Article 1, Section 7)

The Constitution expressly mentions Jesus Christ as Lord? It says it was “DONE in convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth.” The “Twelfth” refers to how many years it had been since the Declaration of Independence had been penned, from which the founding of the country was gauged. There are several religious references in that founding document, including mention of a “firm reliance on divine Providence.” All of the signers of the Declaration claimed Christianity as their religious faith, and when they mentioned God they knew that they were referring to the Christian God.

Calvinism is credited with many of the concepts in the Constitution, particularly the system of checks and balances which is an acknowledgement of the sinfulness of man and the need for curbs and protections against too much concentrated power? Many of the members of the Constitutional Convention were Princeton graduates, a Presbyterian college which John Eidsmoe said, “One thing is certain: the Christian religion, particularly Rev. Witherspoon’s (the president of Princeton College) Calvinism, which emphasized the fallen nature of man, influenced Madison’s view of law and government.”

Christianity was the expressly established religion of every state at the time of the founding of the country? Each had a religious requirement for holding office and voting, generally requiring agreement to Trinitarian Christianity and the inspired, infallible nature of the Bible. The tenth amendment acknowledged that the powers not delegated to the United States were reserved to the states or to the people. Though its laws reflect Christian moral law, the founders did not include a religious test in the nation’s Constitution after the bitter battles with Parliament over a centralized government’s involvement in religion. Every sovereign state had a Christian framework which was unique. Anyone who didn’t agree with it was free to move elsewhere. (See The United States: A Christian Republic by R.J. Rushdoony)

Not only did Congress once upon a time open with prayer, it opened with entire worship services which were even attended by Thomas Jefferson? In case you didn’t know, the phrase “separation between church and state” appears nowhere in the Constitution; it was written by Jefferson in a letter to a group of Baptists to reassure them that no national church (i.e. preferrring one Christian denomination over another) would be adopted.

I couldn’t find the word “pluralism” in the Noah Webster 1828 Dictionary? I don’t think it was a word, or concept, which existed at the founding of our nation. The closest I could find is “pluralist: n. A clerk or clergyman who holds more ecclesiastical benefices than one, with cure of souls.” Pluralism is an egalitarian concept which presupposes that all ideas, philosophies and religions are of equal standing. In reality, all ideas, philosophies and religions will vie for supremacy and be intolerant of their competitors. There is only one truth and it is God’s truth. Within a Christian framework, people may disagree about details of how that truth is applied, but the founders of this nation worked within that framework. If Christianity is not the foundation for the laws of our nation and the actions of our leaders, another religion will be, whether it’s secular humanism, atheism, Islam or another false belief system. There is no neutrality.



Be a Poet, Doncha Know It?

Tuesday, September 28 2004 -- Filed under: — Carmon @ 10:19 pm

In the morning, crack of dawn,
We’ll jump up with a yawn,
Switch the TeeVee knob to ON
And watch the pretty little airplanes.

Flying up to outer space,
Prizes winning in this race,
History books will make a place
For the maker of the pretty little space plane.

I don’t want to be up too late tonight, so I’ll leave you with my painfully poetic public service announcement, and one other poetic link before I bid you adieu.

Our refrigerator and freezer are covered with magnetic poetry, which we mostly ignore unless someone gets a brilliant flash of boredom, then we try to outdo one another with our clever blank verse. If you want to test the creative waters without embarrassing yourself publicly as I frequently do, here’s magnetic poetry online, and to make it easier, it’s the kid’s version. Here’s my contribution to the new but growing field of magnetic poetry:

once upon a time in the castle
the nice queen reads a book too fast
on a sunny day the book makes a scary noise
under my bed I throw the monster
through the air on the floor
I go to sleep
she wakes me up in the morning
sometimes a story is funny
unless it’s time for bed
the end



Rock the Boat, Baby

Monday, September 27 2004 -- Filed under: — Carmon @ 10:51 pm

I’m sure Donna will remember this song. It seems to be the theme song of the Republican cheerleaders as we get closer to election day. While there are some local candidates in the GOP whom we can support with a clear conscience, the state and the local party have played the shell game too often for us to continue giving our support. It’s a clear case of fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. Our love affair with the GOP is over…we’re gonna rock the boat.

Our family does not take this drastic step lightly. We’re just tired of being used. We were faithful to the party: walking precincts with babies in tow, sporting bumper stickers on our cars, holding political meetings in our home, writing big checks to our candidates, stuffing envelopes, writing letters, encouraging our sons to staff phone banks and booths at the fair, helping Pieter start and run a Young Republicans club in our county, getting pelted with vegetables in Sodom by the Bay when we went to a fundraiser for Bush Sr. My muffin mixes still serve at the Republican Women’s Club luncheons every month. We were part of the religious right whose votes are coveted every election cycle. We were part of that demographic group that P.T. Barnum wryly noted as being born every minute. We actually believed the promises that were never fulfilled—you know, about the return of “limited government”—and we were grateful for the few crumbs that were thrown to us. If we didn’t get a seat at the table, at least we got to crouch underneath it so we could fight for those crumbs.

We’re getting too old to go crawling around under tables. We’re getting more crotchety, too. We don’t just want a place at the table anymore; we want to have a say in who’s invited to the party. There are a lot of folks who have crashed the party who just don’t belong there. The big tent is getting so large, it’s hard to keep up with the housekeeping, and it’s threatening to become drafty, too.

Let me tell you a little story. It was not long ago that all the Friedrichs still gave our time, energy and affection to the Republicans. In our state, it was time for the primary elections to elect a candidate to represent our party in the gubernatorial race. Three main contenders emerged to run for this coveted position. One had been mayor of Los Angeles and was touting his experience in that executive position, but he was an unabashed liberal. One had been Secretary of State and a state legislator and was touting his experience in both the executive and legislative arenas, but he was a compromising moderate. The third candidate, Bill Simon, had never held public office (except as an assistant District Attorney in New York City) and he was touting his experience as a businessman saying that he would treat the state government, which was running huge budget deficits because of Gray Davis’s ineptitude, as a business and whip it into shape. He talked like a true blue conservative, even about prolife issues. Thus, like in Goldilocks and the Three Bears, one was too hot, one was too cold and one was just right.

You can imagine how the media, and even many Republicans, painted Mr. Simon. They put a big red “E” in the middle of his forehead: EXTREMIST. The primaries drew closer and it became a race between the liberal ex-mayor and Mr. Simon, whom we adopted as our candidate. Pieter got a chance to spend several hours riding around with him when he came to our county. Our boys helped at his fundraisers and he came to know them by name. Everyone thought that in California, there was no way a man who stood for conservative principles was electable, even in the Republican primary. But on election day, Simon won, and he won by quite a lot. He did not win the general election, however, as Gray Davis’s slime machine was on full force, and he fought dirty and won by a slim margin.

Everyone knows what happened then: Davis was recalled within a year because of his gross mismanagement of the state government (and the diligent efforts of some of our conservative friends). Then another hotly-contested race for governor took place. Again, the Republicans fielded two candidates who represented diverse views: Tom McClintock, a staunch conservative, and that guy with the big muscles. We stood behind McClintock and we rejoiced when he wiped up the floor at the well-publicized debate. But the muscle-man had big name recognition, even though McClintock had been faithfully serving the state for over twenty years and proven his mettle as a man of principle and integrity. The poll numbers were all over the place depending on which poll. Then the endorsements started coming in. One by one, the most conservative players in the state government, people who claimed to be prolife and who courted the evangelical voters, gave their support to the guy who proudly proclaimed that he was for a woman’s right to choose to kill her baby. The reason? He’s more electable. The clincher was when Bill Simon, who knew what it was like to be the underdog and come from behind because of sticking to his principles, gave his endorsement to Arnold.

Pragmatism over principle. It’s not a pretty sight. We had an 18-year-old son who was very disillusioned over Simon’s Benedict Arnold switch. We teach our children that principles are convictions that we operate by in our daily lives, convictions we have adopted because we believe that they are derived from clear biblical injunctions in various areas. Principles are not to be compromised when the going gets tough. If we change those convictions in midstream, then we are being doubleminded. When the going gets tough, we are to get on our knees and plead with the one who directs the heart of the king. If we stick to our principles but lose an election to a Democrat, there is no reason to be fearful. God will honor our faithfulness to biblical principles, even in the midst of wicked leaders. The outcome is up to Him, our job is to obey.

I’ve heard some silly arguments that my way of thinking is naïve, that in the world of politics you have to compromise in order to make gains. Folks, I’ve been watching and waiting a long time to see some of those gains. They just aren’t happening. In my Bible it doesn’t say anything about operating by a different set of rules in the so-called political realm. God’s in charge everywhere. I don’t think I’m the one being naïve.

I do not worry about who will win the election. Whoever God elects will be the winner. I do worry about the number of Christians I see who are ignoring some very disturbing trends in the Republican party and among so-called conservative leaders. If you watch the debate this week between Bush and Kerry, ask yourself two questions whenever you hear President Bush talk about what he will do when he is reelected: is that a biblical function of the civil magistrate and is it constitutional? If the answer to either of those questions is “no,” then pray about whether you should be supporting one who stands against what we ought to be standing for.

I know I’ve been too long-winded on this topic, but I hope you will spend some time in the next few days reading these three articles which have lots of wisdom to contribute about these issues:

R.C. Sproul, Jr. makes a very relevant connection between the current political situation and the story of the spineless spies who were afraid of giants when they should have been fearing God.

Dave Black evaluates the two-party system and finds that it comes up short. Am I the only one who finds it odd that Zell Miller, a Democrat, is given a primetime slot at the RNC when the prolife conservatives were given the boot? It’s not so much that Miller is disaffected by his party, but the two parties are looking more and more alike. Bush has appointed more open homosexuals to key positions in his administration than Bill Clinton!

Dean May muses over what it should look like when we are keeping the first commandment. He says, “Throughout scripture the state god has always been the rival of Yahweh. Why should we think we are immune today? Go online and look at the text of John Kerry’s or George Bush’s acceptance speeches. Look at how much they are promising to get the state god to do for us, things we should be looking to Yahweh to provide.”

I’m tired of being taken for a ride…let’s rock the boat.



Jumper Babe Alert

-- Filed under: — Carmon @ 8:13 am

It’s been a little over a year since I made the decision to wear only dresses and skirts. I didn’t make the decision because there’s a Bible verse that says, “Thou shalt not wear pants.” There are many admonitions, however, to be modest, and being a simple-minded Prairie Muffin (quiet in the “Amen” corner), I take that to mean that women should be properly covered and not put their bodies on public display. Last summer I got fed up with the public displays of female forms in every shape and size every time I went to town. So, I made the rather rebellious decision to go against the flow and make a statement that a)I like being a girl and b)modesty means covering up but it doesn’t mean frumpy.

I mostly wear skirts, but I find jumpers (even denim ones) handy, too. There are some really cute styles of jumpers available now, and they make a great alternative to jeans, very versatile since they can be worn with many kinds of tops and footwear. If you enjoy being a girl and want to look more like one, there is a great sale at the Eddie Bauer outlet right now. The prices on many jumpers and skirts is reduced, and they take 40% off those reduced prices when you check out! The sizes and colors are limited.

Who’da thunk that wearing a dress would be making a political statement? ;-)


Original site by Hans Friedrich  -- (Valid XHTML)